![]() Nevertheless, the Church has been the official guardian of the Shroud for the House of Savoy, the former ruling family of Italy. Salvation is that which is given to us by Christ” ( Columbia, June 1998). Salvation is not in the Shroud, even if it truly wrapped the martyred body of Jesus, even if it was mysteriously given by God to His Church. As Cardinal Saldarini of Turin stated, “It’s not Christ, but something that brings us back to him. However, to believe that the Shroud is the actual burial cloth of the Lord is not a matter of faith. Pope Pius XII stated, “A precious treasure, the Holy Shroud, which displays, both to move and comfort us, the image of the lifeless body and tortured face of Christ.” And Pope Blessed John XXIII declared, “ Digitus Dei est hic” (“The finger of God is here”). His predecessors have also viewed the Shroud favorably. The Holy Father has visited the Shroud both in 1978 and most recently in June, 1998. For instance, in 1980, the Holy Father stated, “The Holy Shroud, the most splendid relic of the passion and the resurrection.” Almost ten years later, in April, 1989, he was asked by reporters during an in-flight press conference on the way to Madagascar about the Shroud, and he responded, “It certainly is a relic!” Again, almost ten years later, when asked if the Shroud was genuine, the Pope said, “I think it is!” (as reported in Columbia, 1998). Without declaring its authenticity, Pope John Paul II has clearly attested to the value of the Shroud. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case for Pluto.Many of the faithful sincerely believe that the Shroud of Turin is the actual burial cloth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. Gallery: The lighter side of religious sightings.Gallery: Are these artifacts fake or not?.Gallery: The archaeology of Christianity.Newsvine: What do you think of the Shroud?.Could new test settle Shroud of Turin debate?.I apologize to those whose messages I have not approved, either because I just couldn't get to them or because they struck a slightly wrong or redundant chord. I also apologize to those who may take offense at some of the messages that were approved. Thanks to all of you who wrote in - and whether you're Christian or Jew, Muslim or Buddhist, of some other faith or of no religious faith at all, have an uplifting week! ET March 31: I've been wading through thousands of comments on this item - an exercise that has revealed once again how fallible mortals (and software) can be. "The question is, how wrong are they? The further back you go, the less likely it is that anybody could have faked it." "We know the carbon-14 is wrong," he said. Have scientists been wrong about the shroud? Downing noted that historical records referring to the shroud predate the current carbon-14 estimate. ![]() More than a million reservations have been received already for next month's viewing. The last time the relic was exhibited, a decade ago, more than 3 million people came to Turin to see it. What's more, the shroud is due to go on display for six weeks at Turin Cathedral, starting April 10. Just this month, a chemist proposed a new series of non-destructive dating tests that would give an estimate for the entire cloth.įrom a marketing perspective, the timing of the History Channel show couldn't be better: Good Friday and Easter Sunday, the Christian holy days that mark Jesus' death and resurrection, are just a few days away. But the shroud's fans have insisted that the sample was actually taken from a patch, rather than from the original linen. The verdict from three laboratories was that the cloth was produced in medieval times. A rough computer model shows the 3-D face imprinted on the Shroud of Turin.īack in 1988, carbon-14 dating tests were conducted on a sample from the shroud in an effort to determine whether the cloth was created in Jesus' time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |